Using firefox but concerned now

Read about some alternatives:

Edit 2/28: It seems there is no general consensus if we should switch and/or to what.

  • icogniito@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Zen, absolutely love the workflow and the fact that it is not chromium based.

    Waiting excitedly for ladybird, it is already very impressive but still years left until it is daily drive able

  • penguin202124 (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Firefox with Arkenfox. I’m not going to help the Chromium monopoly. The changes suck, but oh the hell well.

    Edit: Switched to Librewolf because I was too lazy to reinstall Arkenfox. It’s great!

  • JAdsel@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I have found Mozilla’s sync across devices handy, but now I’m in the process of moving over to using Vanadium on my GrapheneOS phone and FireDragon on desktop.

    FireDragon started out as a Librewolf fork, but is more recently based on Floorp. They are still keeping in sync with Librewolf’s privacy enhancements, with some of their own thrown in. I like that the default search engine is Garuda’s instance of Searx, with Whoogle as another option if you don’t want to self host. FireDragon will also sync your Firefox account off Garuda’s server instance if you like (which would be more useful if I weren’t going with a Chromium fork on mobile). The Garuda project is certainly looking more trustworthy than Mozilla these days.

  • nycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I still use firefox despite their questionable leadership, for one major reason: it prevents Google from setting whatever web standards they want. Sites that aren’t standards compliant will usually still work in Chromium-based browsers, but they will break in Firefox, and then I can report the bugs.

  • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I use FireDragon, because it’s the only browser I could find that has a vertical tab-bar that collapses. Supposedly Zen does it, too, but I couldn’t get it to work.

    FireDragon also has a toolbar to the side with a notepad and other neat stuff. I haven’t used that yet, but it could be cool.

  • kyub@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I use several, depending on use case:

    • Tor Browser for general and anonymous web browsing (e.g. reading news, looking up stuff, and so on)
    • Mullvad Browser as a clear web alternative for general use
    • Librewolf for generally logging into sites with personally identifiable accounts (e.g. to buy stuff)
    • Ungoogled Chromium for those few sites which only work with a Chromium-based browser, or other specific cases
    • On Android (GrapheneOS): Tor Browser and Vanadium

    All regular browsers have some hardening applied and uBlock Origin installed.

  • verdigris@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Still Firefox. Every time Mozilla does anything the entire privacy community goes insane. The terms of use they published seem entirely benign, and the only thing anyone can actually point to is the “direction being worrisome”. Well, I’ll get worried when they update the terms to be actually onerous. Everything even possibly annoying can be disabled, and it’s still the only browser engine offering competition against Chrome ruling the web.

  • Arfman@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    I was thinking of switching to one of the Firefox forks but have only tried Waterfox so far and not super impressed. I guess Firefox is the best out of the bad bunch until I find an alternative I like.

        • phlegmy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 days ago

          Ah fair enough, can’t argue with personal preference.
          You sure you weren’t using waterfox classic though? That has a more dated UI than the current version.

          I personally use librewolf anyway, but waterfox is still a pretty decent step up from Firefox, privacy-wise.

  • InvisibleRasta@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 days ago

    Waterfox is based on esr, so quite outdated. Just use librewolf and some css. You have firefox-one that will make it look pretty and similar to zen. Zen is no good if you care about privacy.

      • InvisibleRasta@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        It doesn’t have good privacy defaults and is easily fingerprintable with all the mods and tweaks it has… You will have to use a user.js at least but it will probably not get as good as mullvad or librewolf

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I use Firefox. I don’t like the changes but I don’t want to use any downstream browsers and I don’t think any of the not-downstream alternatives do better.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 days ago

        I just don’t care for downstream projects on browsers, with software so critical I want to get the updates in as fast as possible. I know some of those mentioned in OP had issues with that in the past. And not much reason to anyway for me to switch, Firefox works perfectly fine for me, so there’s not much added benefit.

        • klu9@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’ve been using the Firefox mod Zen Browser on Linux Mint. When Firefox released an update in February, my Zen had it the next day. People depending on the “official” Firefox were left waiting over a week, with multiple threads in the forums asking “when is it coming?”

          Also when I looked into mods updates for a critical security fix in November, practically all the mods had updated within 24 hours of FF’s update. (Exceptions: Midori and Mercury.) https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?p=2554267&sid=4f140800c5d62939af8e6394514b9aab#p2554267

            • klu9@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Zen: On one machine, Flatpak. On the other, AppImage through AM. Firefox: Mint-maintained version from Mint repo (deb).

              I can’t remember the exact differences between Firefox upstream and Mint version. But I believe Mint began maintaining their own deb at a time when upstream Ubuntu was only offering Firefox as a snap, which Mint is against, and Mozilla hadn’t yet begun offering their own deb repo.

              • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                That’s where the delay comes. Though I guess it does point out that even with just Firefox the differences are small in how quickly you get updates.

        • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Understand your point of view but in fact the 2 problems you mentioned are mainly not problems :

          1 - Updates? The main downstream browsers received updates the same time as Firefox the same day and sometime the same hour

          2 - Benefits? The benefits are mainly under the hood, removing Mozilla telemetry and annoying features (account, pocket…) AND the biggest advantages are the gain in term of privacy due the increase of anti fingerprinting methods

          • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            But who’s making these “updates”? Who’s doing the actual work of keeping the software secure? Mozilla is.

            If everybody moves to a free-riding fork, Mozilla goes to 0% and there will be no browser let alone updates.

            • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              This needs to be higher up. We need firefox as an alternative to a chrome engine monopoly. ToS and telemetry are miniscule issues compared to what we are up against

              Firefox is literally the last thing standing between google controlling the entire browser landscape and having control over all web standards (as if they dont already have too much influence)

              People ditching firefox over tos, telemetry, AI, CEO pay, etc. are cutting off their nose to spite their face. Do i wish mozilla would stop doing stupid shit? Of course. But the alternative is far worse. Dont let perfect be the enemy of good. Mozilla will never be as ideologically pure as we want them to be, but that’s OK (for now)

              • MangoCats@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 days ago

                Depends on which way the Firefox ditchers jump - jumping to Chrome, yeah… not great. Jumping to more privacy respecting options… it’s your data, you should be able to choose (if you care…)

                • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  Read the post above mine… “Privacy respecting options” are almost always downstream forks of firefox. Abandon/kill the source, and downstream dries up

  • borokov@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    Brave.

    Because I installed it when it was pre-alpha version. Ended up to an ugly window with just an addresse bar. I though “this shit will never worked, yet another utopistic project, too bad…”

    Then, came back 2 years later, gave him a 2nd chance and “OMG ! They fucking did it !”. So I keep it as a redemption for not having believed in the project at first.

  • Turturtley@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 days ago

    My issue is that while i am concerned about privacy, i’m more concerned with security patching. And none of these smaller browsers have the resources to turn around security fixes as quickly as firefox or chrome.

    Firefox is the least of the concerns as long as we have the config options to disable anything deemed not privacy-respecting.

    • ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 days ago

      This is the only good critique in this entire thread (thank you) BUT librewolf is on the exact same version as Firefox. It appears their updates are pretty fast.

      Would you have config recommendations beyond the obvious?

      • Turturtley@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I’m probably not the best person to talk to about Firefox hardening. Because… I don’t. I only go as far as using firefox containers.

        My threat model is to counter:-

        • ISP data logging
        • government filters
        • region blocking
        • hyper-personalised marketing

        I use a VPN for the first three, and I use Ublock, and don’t use google/meta/twitter/amazon/ebay for last.

        I personally believe it is impossible to escape fingerprinting unless you’re on Tor Browser, but using Tor paints you as a target in my country per the first item above.

        I also work in financial services, and am a user of my company’s product. We do significant ‘device intelligence’ and ‘behavioral intelligence’ on client devices, auth attempts, and actions taken in sessions. Log in too many times from too many different (seemingly) devices, user agents, IP addresses, regions, etc and it increases our customer risk assessment of you. Tick over a threshold and your account falls under enhanced customer due diligence. Tick over another threshold, and we’ll set auto-blocks until we can investigate. I assume that any other financial services provider worth their salt would do the same to counter fraud, money laundering, and meeting sanctions.

        I basically use a split tunnel VPN. VPN traffic for general browsing, email, etc. And looking as much as a regular user as possible when accessing financial services, government websites, etc.

        And yeah, agree LibreWolf is great. Only downside for the average user is the lack of an auto-updater. So the only tweak i’d do with LibreWolf would be to set up a cron/systemd timer to update it nightly.