This Black History Month, it’s important to recognize that economic injustice—both in Canada and around the world—is deeply rooted in racism. The property system in Canada was founded on the forced displacement and exclusion of Indigenous peoples from their land and immigration policies that prevented non-white immigration, effectively barring many thousands of people from accessing property in Canada. These racialized colonial systems laid the foundation for the current racial wealth gap, where racialized Canadians have about half as much wealth as their non-racialized counterparts.
Unlike the United States, where constitutional barriers have historically shielded the ultra-rich from direct taxation, Canada faces no such constitutional legal obstacles—only political ones. And those political excuses are running out.
A wealth tax enjoys overwhelming public support. Nearly 90 percent of Canadians back it, yet successive Liberal and Conservative governments have refused to act. Their refusal isn’t due to legal constraints but to the immense influence of corporate lobbyists and billionaire donors who oppose any effort to make them pay their fair share.
Just last year, powerful corporate interests mobilized to kill a progressive tax measure that would have primarily targeted Canada’s wealthiest citizens and corporations: the partial closure of the capital gains loophole.
Call it a property tax so pedons can understand it
For some weird reason they are allergic to taxing rich people’s stock but pay property taxes on their houses and cars with out any complaints lol
That’ll yield the opposite outcome when one of the top complaints from homeowners is their property taxes and how they should remain frozen or cut for the rest of time
Well currently property taxes scale very nicely with housing inflation…
Property taxes are never getting cut, they won’t even adjust people’s bills even property start to devalue, see Detroit post 2008. They were forcing people paying in 2012 based on 2008 valuation. Then proceed to forcefully remove people once they taxes went delinquent. Lien, kicked out, can’t sell the house… then municipality has to pay to clear the slots due to blight.
They can have fund demanding that all day to play as a dilatory clown OR they could demand that owners of stocks and other assets pay their taxes to increase the tax revenue in era of massive government debt that twas largely used to acquire these stocks and other assets.
Detroit isn’t a good example for Canadian property tax. Ontario reasseses property taxes every 4 years, and as far as I can tell, it’s 100% possible for them to go down as they are tied to the specific property and municipality, not national inflation.
You can get ta reassessment in US too…
not national inflation.
I did not say national inflation, i said housing inflation which is reflected in local comparables in year over year basis whichpart of government uses to asses property values for tax.
So in US it is theoretically possible to challenge the assessment and have it reduced but look doing that without a proper counsel and an actual good case.
What happened in Detroit was malfeasance tough because they kept relying on old valuation despite property values tanking because municipal budget was border line in default on their bonds and i think they eventually BK’ed anyway. But not before gutting entire neighborhoods and ruining peoples lives. Because fuck the poor. That’s why.
What sort of numbers are people expecting for this? I read somewhere that the NDP proposed a tax of 1-2% on assets above $10M, does that sound right?
I was curious about specifics but couldn’t find any in the article.
previous NDP proposal and expected revenues https://www.investmentexecutive.com/news/industry-news/ndps-proposed-wealth-tax-would-generate-60-billion-over-five-years-pbo/
Gary Stevenson explained it, so long as inequality grows, the rest of us will be struggling more and more.
Capitalism does not inherently specify that 5 fat old cucks should own everything.
The system created by the rich does that. If capital was decentralized, i bet we would have a lot less social issues.
Capital abhors decentralization and always works towards centralization and monopolization.
That means 5 people owning everything on a long enough time scale. Then 4, then 3, etc.
Capital is a tool fundamentally i know we collectively have label modern aristocracy as capital but that’s because we can’t envision a world where we all own a proper share of country’s economy and have it pass through generations.
I think closest concept people can understand is “middle class” aint people who had some assets that insulted them from ups and downs of the clown economy.
We literally can’t share the economy under capitalism. Capitalism is a tool, but it’s a tool limited by its purpose.
Just like you can’t use a hammer to solder a circuit board, you can’t use capitalism to create a sharing economy.
You can’t make yourself taller by cutting off other people’s legs.