She came in way behind Sanders…

The Dems weren’t all that helpful when they had power…

Didn’t Harris come dead last in the only dem primary for POTUS candidate that she ran in?

China is bad, because they too are a colonialism and imperialistic nation.

Just like the US and Russia.

Zulip.

Ircv3 has reactions, and threads. Along with some other features, like persistent convos.

Voice and screen sharing can be implemented via external services.

Edited condo to convo… ircv3 does not have condos :)

Different styles of conversation.

At the owners discretion. See: on other people’s properrty.

For a training set. Natural, and familiar conversations.

Depends.

On your property, using your voice? Sure.

At 2:30am, you yelling it 20ft from your neighbor’s house? Probably nor, mainly as it disturbs other people’s normal use of their home.

On someone else’s property? Depends on if they allow it.

In public, in the commons? Sure, as long as people are allowed to ignore you.

Just ribbons an print heads

I think that was mainly due to the concern of hostile actors committing code to the kernel.

It’s literally used anywhere that uses a latin derived alphabet… and a ton of Cyrillic cultures use it…

Not sure about other alphabets.

More specifically, it’s capitalism that is the problem, not tech.

I refuse to debate ideas on how to make ethical CSAM with you.

Go find a pedo to figure out how you want to try to make CSAM, and you can well akshully all tou want.

yeah but like, legally, is this even a valid argument?

Personally, legal is only what the law allows the wealthy to do, and provides punishments for the working class.

Morally, that’s what you’re doing when you use AI to generate CSAM. Its the same idea why we ban all pre-created CSAM, as well, because you are victimizing the person every single time.

i dont see how this is even relevant, unless the person in question is a minor, a victim, or becoming a victim,

It makes them a victim.

But i don’t know of any laws that prevent you from doing that, unless it’s explicitly to do with something like blackmail, extortion, or harassment.

The law exists to protect the ruling class while not binding them, and to bind the working class without protecting them.

Does a facial structure recognition model use the likeness of other people?

Yes.

Even though it can detect any person that meets the requirements established by its training data? There is no suitable method to begin to breakdown at what point that persons likeness begins, and at what point it ends. it’s simply an impossible task.

Exactly. So, without consent, it shouldn’t be used. Periodt.

No, the problem is a lack of consent of the person being used.

And now, being used to generate depictions of rape and CSAM.

i have no problem with ai porn assuming it’s not based on any real identities

With any model in use, currently, that is impossible to meet. All models are trained on real images.

I don’t think using “haha they might be kissing each other! Musk sucks Trumps dick!” is somehow effective criticism of actual fascists in office.

It is, for them.

Especially having Trump be “the bottom”.

Ever watch Shameless, the US version? Its along the same lines as Terry, Mickey’s dad. He only hated Mickey because he was catching, because “It aint gay if you’re doing the fucking, just if you get fucked”.

So, in this case, yes, making implications of gay sex happening, with Trump catching, is VERY effective at it.