The houses most people can afford would just get destroyed by police during encampment sweeps.
The houses most people can afford would just get destroyed by police during encampment sweeps.
Maybe I’m not understanding your perspective. Do you advocate violence against violent criminals?
You’re against the use of violence against violent criminals?
Yikes, I got a tough one.
“Don’t be alarmed,” he said. “You are looking for Jesus the Nazarene, who was crucified. He has risen! He is not here. See the place where they laid him.”
— Mark 16:6
That’s true, and it’s probably the only way forward at this point, but it sure makes things harder than they needed to be.
How is Firefox’s baggage anywhere close to homophobia and a crypto scam
I’ll just go get one of those good jobs that I didn’t already have for some reason. If only there was some way to have more leverage for pay negotiation. /s
Then striking workers have no legal protections, either. Better than no strikes, but we’ve basically lost 100 years of progress.
I’ve got a pirate flag that says “I’d rather be drinking rum”. I never drink and drive, but I like reminding everyone to pirate things.
But then you might get keyed
Those two rules are purely individualistic, though. What about problems that we all need to coordinate on in order to make our lives well, like climate change?
True peace is not merely the absence of tension: it is the presence of justice.
— Martin Luther King Jr.
Except Ukraine actually fucking matters
The hidden cost of 60-hour work weeks.
Username checks out
Yes, like the other reply
You’re half right… monetary policy is a huge source of inequality, but that’s because congress obeys their rich owners.
If there was some way to opt out of their monetary policy, then you’d think it would already be catching on. 😉
The property cap is a lot easier in practice. You can’t hide land!