• 12 Posts
  • 56 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 7th, 2023

help-circle


  • That’s the problem, really. They all have pros and cons.

    Kagi is American, so they are out for me. So is DuckDuckGo.

    I don’t care if startpage uses the Google index, since Google isn’t profiting from my data or from ads.

    Their servers are in the EU, and the balance between privacy and usable results is good enough.

    I see it like using a third-party front end for YouTube. All of the benefits with none of the risks or private data theft.








  • My adventure into self-hosting started with a Synology NAS maybe 5 years (?) ago.

    With just the built-in software, I was able to replace Google Photos, Evernote, Dropbox, Google Calendar, Google contacts, and Google Play Music and Movies.

    Then as I learned how to use docker, I was able to replace more services.

    There may be “better” options out there beyond what Synology offers, but it’s been such a “set and forget” experience, that it’s easy for me to recommend them as an option.

    The biggest barrier, IMO, isn’t the learning curve, but the initial investment for the NAS + HDDs and the upgrade path as your storage needs grow.


  • YouTube Premium is $13/month and I get access to a huge variety of channels.

    Here’s the thing… if you divided up that $13 among all the channels you watch, and gave the creator that amount, they’d be making more than the money that comes to them from YouTube.

    As an extreme example, let’s say you benefit from 50 unique channels per month. That’s around $0.26 each channel ($13 / 50), which is MORE than what YouTube would pay them for your views.

    If you only watch 10 channels on a regular basis, that’s $1.30 per channel, per month - way, wayyy more than what youtube pays out for a single user per month.

    With enough paying simply paying creators pennies per month, they’d make more than enough money to cut out ads, sponsors, and other unsavoury forms of monetization.

    Louis Rossman has talked about this a few times, but as someone who has a YouTube channel, I can confirm this to be true.


  • There are lots of “for fun” YouTube channels but what enables so many people to publish so many videos is the fact that they can profit off of them.

    That’s such a double-edge sword.

    I have a channel with tens of thousands of followers and nearly 200, long-form content in the educational/healthcare space.

    I was creating videos way before I was “allowed” to monetize, and even after, I was not making them so I could profit. No sponsored content. No begging for likes. No paid products. Not even affiliate links.

    If my motivation was driven by profit, then the quality of the videos would suffer. And when I see channels that really push hard to monetize, it’s off-putting as a viewer, and I’m less interested in what they have to say - even if it might benefit me.

    On the flip-side, I know some content creators have to spend a lot of money to create certain content, so they should be able to recoup that somehow.

    I personally prefer a donation model, since it keeps things unbiased, with the creator having far more freedom, and it doesn’t disrespect users. Even having a shop selling channel merch is a more ethical way to monetize, provided that the channel doesn’t become one big ads for the merch store.

    Good channels could absolutely make enough through donations to turn their channel into a full-time, paying job. And a donation model would also help to cull channels that create garbage content, AI generated content, and clickbait crap.