Every time I see this I think, if I was asked my response would be “has she just had a limb amputated? If so, probably still no but maybe.”
Serena: Omae ha mou shindeiru Jason: NANI
My mom could kick my ass at tennis ( …in her prime, she’s in her eighties now), I don’t need to ask Ms. Williams to do it.
Mom was, in fact, a tennis enthusiast when I was a kid and played weekly, and even at my best I had a crap backhand.
Give me like 30 solid years to practice and I’m confident that I could narrowly snatch one point away from an elderly Serena Williams.
Same, but only if I could also stop aging while Serena continues to. I think I might have a chance with 30 years of practice playing against a 73 year old Serena, assuming I get lucky and she breaks a hip.
I mean, she just has to serve out once in a match to win the scenario in this question. I don’t think it’s that unreasonable.
Isn’t a point in tennis what you get by winning 4 volleys in a round?
That’s a game.
A point is a single rally. Then winning 4 points (gotta win by 2 though) wins you the game. First to 6 games (but also by 2) wins you the set. And then the match is usually best of 3 or 5 sets.
Statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged
I think you say that because you don’t understand the actual point structure.
So first point is actually 15. But some people like to just say 5 instead. Now if you both have a point, then you would say 15 all or 5 all. After that, the next point is 30. If you’re tied it’s 30 all. Now the next point is, you got it, 40. If you’re tied, you would obviously say, duece. Now if you score a point, after having 3 points, which is called 40, and you would have more than 2 points than your opponent, then you have won the game, which is the name of a set of points and does not mean you won the whole game. But if you would have 1 more point than your opponent after scoring a point after your 3rd point, then instead of getting a game, you get advantage. You need to score 1 more point to win the game, which is just a set of points and not the whole game. If you have advantage, and your opponent scores a point then you lose your advantage, and it’s right back to duece, which is what you say when both players have 40, which is actually 3 points.
Easy right?
I don’t love this.
You say the first point is 15, but you must remember that both players start on an egg, called love.
Honestly, I have no idea how tennis works.
It is honestly a difficult game to get into. But of a steel learning curve, and the point system doesn’t help. Very fun game and ive seen there’s a huge community of people that play it, which is great for networking
Tennis has a long history of ‘Battle of the sexes’ matches.
1998: Karsten Braasch vs. the Williams sisters Another event dubbed a “Battle of the Sexes” took place during the 1998 Australian Open between Karsten Braasch and the Williams sisters. Venus and Serena Williams had claimed that they could beat any male player ranked outside the world’s top 200, so Braasch, then ranked 203rd, challenged them both. Braasch was described by one journalist as “a man whose training regime centered around a pack of cigarettes and more than a couple of bottles of ice cold lager”. The matches took place on court number 12 in Melbourne Park, after Braasch had finished a round of golf and two shandies. He first took on Serena and after leading 5–0, beat her 6–1. Venus then walked on court and again Braasch was victorious, this time winning 6–2. Braasch said afterwards, “500 and above, no chance.” He added that he had played like someone ranked 600th in order to keep the game “fun” and that the big difference was that men can chase down shots much more easily and put spin on the ball that female players could not handle. The Williams sisters adjusted their claim to beating men outside the top 350.
We’re still talking about professional athletes though…. If you were good enough to beat any of them then why the hell are you not doing exactly that?
Edit: formatting…
I mean I guess there’s a non-negligible chance of her hitting a double fault…
So she tries to T them up on the first serve and it goes long. The second serve will surely be a dink over the net because the opponent is nothing for her to fear so they rush the net , return the serve and in an instant their asshole is the size of a tennis ball
I guess there is a better than 0 chance but I wouldn’t bet against her
https://yougov.co.uk/topics/society/survey-results/daily/2019/07/12/ce84b/1
Other fun stuff from the same poll:
- Scots are the least likely to think they could do it, and also the least likely to say “don’t know”. We know where we stand apparently
- 2% of 65+ year old people think they could do it, although 2% is getting well into the territory where it could just be insincere answers
Didn’t realize don’t know was an answer. I feel like that’s a solid answer if you figure there’s a chance of an error or something. I wouldn’t put it since I don’t play, though.
2% insincere/ random/ did not understand the question/ thought the question was actually asking the opposite… that’s pretty low. Usually hard to get that under 6-7%.
I dunno man, I might accidentally score a point.
Yeah that’s what I’m thinking. I can also get a point off of djocovic, just give me a lot of chances. If we’re talking about a point in one game, nah to either. A point in a 3 set match? I think so.
maybe in Wii Tennis 🤷♀️
Buddy, you think 23-time grand slam winner Serena Williams isn’t going to dust your ass at wii tennis too? 😤
Man, unless you’re on the pro tour, you’re getting handled easily. Tennis is about angle knowledge and of course you have to be in top condition.
Serena wipes the floor with the avg man and college level tennis players of all genders.
I only need one point in a whole match? I’d just hope for a double-fault.
That’s probably the best bet for us regular folk, but the problem is that she probably knows that she really doesn’t need to go anywhere near as hard as she could to get every serve past us
A 12 percenter eh?
Since they go 15 points at a time, hoping to score at least 1 seems pretty humble to me.
Men who don’t even play tennis fantasising about some monster power serve. That would get chopped off instantly.
deleted by creator
One in eight men who responded to the survey. Come on now probably only one in eight men even play tennis. More men play basketball for fucks sake
Probably not a tonne of people responding to a British polling agency’s survey play basketball, but otherwise yeah. If we go by viewrship figures for the men’s final at Wimbledon, a little over an eighth of the country watches a game of tennis once a year
