• kevinsbacon@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      The issue with lifelong politicians isn’t just their mental capacity but their lifelong detachment from reality as they live in a privileged bubble.

      Wisdom can be written down, that would be more wise to do anyway.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Yes, but there is also Bernie. He is far more attached to reality than any young Republican in the Senate (or Democrat).

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          No one can argue with that, but the reason his name comes up every time is that he’s the exception, not the rule. His net worth is also a fraction of that of Pelosi’s or most of his political peers.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            A ceiling on net worth for representatives is certainly an interesting concept, but not really relevant to the conversation.

            It gets hard to show a correlation with time in service to detachment from reality when one of the longest serving members is the most grounded, and many of the youngest and most recent members are absolutely insane.

            Even Pelosi is pretty progressive relative to the rest of the Democratic representation, and certainly of Congress as a whole. (Very feint praise given the field). She is certainly out of touch, but she was that way when she was far younger as well.

        • SabinStargem@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          12 days ago

          Undoubtedly. However, a Bernie who retired due to age or term limits, would still be able to mentor upcoming politicians. Handing the helm to a competent person and training their successors would be a much wiser strategy than what we currently got.

          Why the hell should we keep creatures like Pelosi, who exist exclusively to suckle from the fetid teat of the stock market?

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            Oh, we should definitely get rid of Pelosi, but not because she aged out. The Pelosi of 30 years ago was just as worthy of dismissal.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            No doubt he’s an exception, but where is evidence for the rule that would justify punishing the exception? When I think of out of touch Congress members, all the first names that come to mind are almost all among the youngest in Congress. Even Pelosi would never be on my short list if she wasn’t in leadership. (She is definitely out of touch, but she has some fierce competition). Also, all the older ones that I think of were just as bad or worse when they were younger.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            Then demonstrate the trend to me. I’ve given you an undeniable counter example. I agree that Congress is out of touch. Are the older Congress members more out of touch than MTG or the psycho tradwife Katie Britt? I don’t think so.