Hah, my question isn’t because I’m a fatally flawed leftist, it’s because I’m a programmer and weekly I get requests from executives that simply aren’t possible or at least feasible to implement.

Your entire comment sounds exactly like one of these hand wavy requests from the heavens where details don’t matter. The cherry on top was you flipping it back at me so that I’d attempt to expand on your ill thought through plan and make it work. I’m sure you do well in the corporate landscape.

How would you go about enforcing it? What happens to the ceo whose wealth ticks about your 1000x threshold due to a good day on the stock market?

Classic they/them gramps

I’m trying to figure out how you could think that and my best guess is you’re just not familiar with modern dating apps.

There’s nothing real world about it. Women are overloaded with choice, men like everyone because they’re desperate and the apps prey on this, forcing pay to win strategies on men. It’s a brutal experience and makes you think women are just doing this for validation if you’re a guy, and if you’re a woman you just think men are dogs who would chase anything.

It’s the reality of dating apps, not real world behavior.

It’s the reality of dating apps, not real world behavior.

I seem to be able to avoid them in almost all situations except for subscriber notifications. For some reason non-short creators that I subscribed too are now jumping on this trend and their shorts get pushed to me too.

The software may change but these tests show it’s the hardware that’s limiting them. If the Tesla can’t see a kid through fog, it doesn’t matter what software you pick, that kid gunna die.

You can be XYY and doctors will shorten that informally to YY. https://www.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/what-are-yy-chromosomes

No idea but it must make OP chuckle