what I really miss from that period of the internet was that children could use it safely
Uhh… my largest grievance with how the Internet has been designed is that it was never safe for children to be on it, yet children were thrust onto it en-mass long before adults even really understood what it was. And still people are ignoring the massive problems it continues to cause, specifically for the healthy development of children, as society is circling the drain.
I think someone calculated the time it would take to read every single one you’re expected to agree with in normal every day life, and it worked out to needing 76 work days to read everything you “agree” to in a typical year.
I just like spreading the good word when people complain about some of Windows’ shitty features.
I was taught in college to only include a single question in one email unless you can’t get around it, because many people will only see the first one.
but that way DRM and windows would be AI too
That’s why I use O&Oshutup to turn off many of windows’ automatic functions. Probably my last windows machine anyways.
I’m considering the term more broadly here, to refer to it because the function takes control away from the user without their input. I also like having to go back and manually correct my own mistakes, to improve my own tpying/spelling.
I don’t use AI, in any form if I can help it. That was a 100% all natural ty[p.
Cunt funding by $1 and drive passion by 100%.
It’s a shame, because a lot of stuff like this is legitimately exciting, but sensationalism tries to sell it as something entirely different and sullies the conversation.
It’s totally immature.
If that’s something you think you’ll have fun doing, I fully recommend it!
bosses are making “regular [people]” pay for their screw-ups
Welcome to human history.
It’s kind of frightening that people who control that much capitol are apparently unaware that social media is not gospel truth.
A lot was invested on the promise of AI, only to discover that it’s not capable of becoming this “super intelligence” people were banking on.
A human has the ability to think outside the box when an unexpected error occurs, and seek resolution. AI could very well just tell you to kill yourself.
‘Political leadership’ doesn’t define reality. People are completely justified to assert rights even if they aren’t expressly approved by big daddy g’vmt. That is, in fact, exactly how most of the rights enshrined in law got there in the first place. The Magna Carta itself had to be forced upon the king through the threat of rebellion by the dukes.
It’s not having any downtime imho. The instant you’re done reading something it’s trivial to find something else to trigger your pleasure centres, so unless you do it through deliberate intention, you’ll never have time to sit and consider what you’ve read.
Thanks, but you’re wasting your time. I’ve got some trolls trying to provoke arguments with me recently.
I liked the part where they taught everyone math and now nobody wants to submit to their really obvious scams anymore, so they started mass importing people who don’t know math.
UK courts did something sane?
The world really is ending.
Because irrational hatred is so ubiquitous that it goes entirely unquestioned (and even defended as you’re likely to see in response to this post), almost nobody seems to be aware that the scientific method was actually developed by the Catholic church as the religiously approved way to explore the mysteries of our world. The view that Christianity is rigid and exclusionary just plain isn’t supported by reality. You can certainly find bad examples and pretend you’ve “proved” something, but there are far, far more good people who aren’t brain dead zealots.