• 7 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: February 10th, 2024

help-circle







  • She seems both qualified for the job and motivated to stand up to the Trump administration’s aggression, both of which are important qualities in a leader of a US state that happens to be the world’s 5th largest economy.

    EDIT:

    For those who downvoted, perhaps you could use your words to explain what you disagree with in my comment, and why? I don’t know Kamala Harris all that well, so if there’s something important that I’m missing, I would like to know about it. A downvote doesn’t help anyone.







  • It’s about money, specifically with a near-term “exit strategy” for investors.

    It lets them push the company into choices that will pump up the stock price so that early shareholders can sell their stock and walk away with profits… without any concern over how those choices will impact the company, its employees, its customers, or the new shareholders in the long term.

    I won’t shed a tear for Discord, though. They are a parasitic corporation that extracts profit from the world’s online communities by using the network effect to lock our communications and collected knowledge behind their terms of service. No company should have control over so much of humanity’s cultural development and history.




  • The headline and photo give the expectation that this is about sugary foods degrading our brains, but the story is actually quite different:

    In a study with aging mice, Shi discovered significant changes in the sugary coating (glycocalyx) on cells that form the blood-brain barrier. This barrier protects the brain by filtering harmful substances and allowing essential nutrients in.

    Shi compares the glycocalyx to a forest: in young, healthy brains, it’s lush and thriving, but in older brains, it becomes sparse and degraded.

    These age-related changes weaken the blood-brain barrier, making it leaky. As a result, harmful molecules can enter the brain, potentially causing inflammation, cognitive decline, and neurodegenerative diseases.






  • I think it’d be great to live in a world where this technology required warrants, transparency, and other oversight from the start.

    Me too.

    It boils down to the fact that this technology is widespread, and will continue to be widespread regardless of my actions

    That same reasoning has been used innumerable times throughout history. I suppose each of us must decide whether we think it holds water. It reminds me of an old adage: No single drop believes it is responsible for the flood.

    Predator does way more than just ALPR.

    I know. I looked it up. I mentioned the name not because I think it represents what it does, but rather to point out that it will affect how people feel about you and your work, even if in subtle, imperceptible ways. It’s up to you to decide whether you’re comfortable with that.


  • I don’t have a specific suggestion, but here is what comes to mind:

    • Violation of human rights and civil liberties in order to gain power over others is always justified with noble-sounding excuses like protecting people and property. The reality does not match the claim.
    • Once violated, privacy of information is almost impossible to restore.
    • Anything that can be abused to someone’s gain will be abused eventually, if not immediately.
    • Relying on a benevolent gatekeeper (even yourself) to prevent abuse of your tech will eventually fail.
    • The name V0LT Predator evokes the feeling that it’s something the world needs less of, not more.

    Whenever I find myself on a fine line like the one you’re trying to walk, I consider whether I’ll look back on my life and be proud of what projects/causes/changes to the world that I advanced with the time and talents that I have.