That’s true for teachers, too.

If it is a lifestyle that would destroy the economy if everyone had it, then that’s another story.

At least someone is brave enough to say it!

Also what’s up with the suicide gangplanks.

The software can, but the price is likely too high. In the end money can pressure anyone to do virtually anything. Having 100 lifetimes of productive work pressuring you to do something cannot just be ignored.

You cannot protect yourself from that without making substantial sacrifices.

At that point the term renting becomes something else entirely and therefore useless to discriminate between renters and homeowners. this discrimination is useful, hence we must not weaken our language.

Hell no!

There are simulated transmissions for the weirdos.

We don’t rent it from them. We pay for continued ownership. The difference being that eviction is not possible and you do not need permits unless you do something more involved to your property. Calling it renting discounts the complexities that renting brings with it. The costs of renting usually are much higher than property taxes.

Certified psycho. If you think owning a plot of land within a country does not have an opportunity cost you are wrong. If you think people imposing costs on others shouldn’t pay for it say it out loud.

Just go and found your own country already, you just need a gun in order to enforce your ownership. In the end a state is just the monopoly of force in a place.

When places go bust faster resale value is more important. this means you need to build generic buildings that hold value when sold or rented.

Eins!

W