Beruflich Web-Entwickler, privat ein Ober Nerd und Links-Grün versifft…
Musik Liebhaber, von #kpop bis #metal alles dabei
Ansonsten bin ich auch gerne mit der Kamera unterwegs.
Entwickler und Maintainer von #mbin
ich bin auch auf mastodon: @BentiGorlich
Ich betreibe thebrainbin.org, gehirneimer.de und wehavecookies.social
The company itself is not for profit. The CEO gets payed way too much, but a for-profit company would return money to the owners (mostly shareholders/investors), which Mozilla is not
You should not need legal people explaining the change of mission statements or FAQs… Imo Mozilla just really sucks at PR (it not just this time)
In an aggregated and anonymized manner
Actually no, I don’t want to hold both to the same standard. Google is a for profit company. I expect them to do shady shit. I expect more out of Mozilla. Doesn’t mean that they screwed this up the way the media says they did. They screwed up the communication big time
I think the fault lies in their online stuff. Things like their VPN, Pocket, FF Sync, etc… Also they collect the aggregated and anonymized ad click thing in the new tab page
If what they have been doing for a while, is now legally “selling your data” in California they just cannot state “we will never sell your data”, as the definition of what is meant by “selling data” exactly is not the same everywhere…
They should not have deleted that statement and just clarify it instead of their absolutely messy changes…
That is just not true… You are not allowed to pay your profits to anyone, but investing it or building reserves is absolutely permitted and a really important thing to do especially if you’re dependent on donations…
I agree, but that will never make me use Chrome or any Chromium based browser. Like probably a lot of people here I do not use vanilla Firefox, but rather LibreWolf and the like