What era in time do these people think R’s are trying to conserve to, after or before civil rights?

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Real question, how can someone be conservative while still supporting progress? Doesn’t the entire ideology hinge on things never changing?

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Conservatism is as broad of a term as liberalism. That said, there is a brand of conservatism that do support progress, but wants to do so in an incrementalist way, which is basically the Democratic Party now that I think about it.

    • homura1650@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      There’s a continuum between nothing ever changes ever, and through away everything and start again from scratch. In practice, actual little-c conservatives are often called incrementalists, because no one is all the way to one end of the spectrum.

      The point here is that Conversatism is not actually a conservative ideology. They actually want to change a lot. In fact, the current administration might be the least conservative one we’ve had. They are much more in the “move fast and break things” camp, which is at the opposite end of the spectrum.

      I think what happened with conservative movements, is they tend to adopt genuinely conservative positions. But then as the world changes around them they are conservative in updateing their positions, so end up having a collection of regressive positions.

      The actual conservatives in America’s current political environment is the conservative wing of the Democratic party.