SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.world · 16 hours agoRulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up1299arrow-down13
arrow-up1296arrow-down1imageRulelemmy.worldSoftestSapphic@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.world · 16 hours agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-squareZ3k3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·16 hours agoBeyond? Wouldn’t that mean it’s rising again
minus-squarelatenightnoir@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·15 hours ago“Below,” not “beyond” :P Which, to my mind, means it would become submolecular, then absolutely negligible - basically non-existent!
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 hours agoIt is a location, going further will not change the size.
minus-squarelatenightnoir@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 hours agoAnd artistic license is a valid concept :P Unless you’re actually expecting an abstract notion such as stock price to physically travel to the Earth’s core.
minus-squareEheran@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 hours agoSure, you can do that. But I would never understand anything like that from such a sentence.
Beyond? Wouldn’t that mean it’s rising again
“Below,” not “beyond” :P Which, to my mind, means it would become submolecular, then absolutely negligible - basically non-existent!
It is a location, going further will not change the size.
And artistic license is a valid concept :P Unless you’re actually expecting an abstract notion such as stock price to physically travel to the Earth’s core.
Sure, you can do that. But I would never understand anything like that from such a sentence.