• snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    What we see in this article appears to abandon that sort of rigor to manufacture more opportunities to confront someone.

    Aka entrapment.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yes, though legally that’s a bit of a grey area. It’s only really entrapment if law enforcement or informants entice the offender to commit a crime they weren’t predisposed to commit. I imagine it would be an uphill battle to convince a judge or jury of that when it comes to meeting minors for sex.

      The decoys were careful so that it would never even be a question.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 days ago

        The article says that they would just lie too.

        Like, they claimed one guy (18) was there to meet a minor (17). When the reporter reviewed the logs it was clear that he was there to meet an 18 year old.

        Getting views is more important than catching a bad guy

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        It is not technically entrapment because they aren’t police, but they are cosplaying as cops so the label gets the point across.