I think those websites are over using trackers in their websites for extra profit with no care for the privacy of their users, I highly recommend avoiding them.
For comparsion:
- Associated Press(AP).
- Al Jazeera.
- ABC.
- BBC.
- CBC.
- DW.
- France24.
- Sky News.
- The Register.
- Tech Policy Press.
Update: added Wired and more websites for comparison.
You can read most of The Guardian without JavaScript.
I was a Guardian subscriber for a while until I looked at their “partners” that they were sharing my data with through the app.
You can use their RSS feeds to avoid a lot of their tracking.
From Europe they’re actually better than the other news sites you list here. Either way, I’m using ad-blocking, DNS filtering, and I do general browsing like this in a separate browser that wipes everything on exit sooo 🤷 saves you from worrying about this stuff or even thinking about it much.
2 things:
they’re actually better than the other news sites you list here.
What you are saying does not make any sense unless you did not click the links to see the amount of trackers in the tests.
Either way, I’m using ad-blocking, DNS filtering, and I do general browsing like this in a separate browser that wipes everything on exit sooo 🤷 saves you from worrying about this stuff or even thinking about it much.
Yet you are using Lemmy instead of Reddit? Which means you kind of understand fully that the tools that you are talking about does not protect you 100% , rather they just reduce the amount of trackers tracking you.
Also it’s pretty dystopian to support the websites that violates people privacy, instead of using the websites that basically provide the same product with better privacy.