• 0 Posts
  • 9 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: January 15th, 2025

help-circle
  • Not true, maybe that was the case with older AI but perplexity deep research will contradict you a lot if what you are saying is not accurate.

    Regarding the theme in question this was my prompt: “probability From 1 to 100 that Trump is a “Putin compromised asset” based on public information and taking into account uncertainty; exclude grok analysis because that could introduce bias in your results”

    This was the response (abbreviated):

    Based on the publicly available information reviewed above, and accounting for the inherent uncertainty in this question, the probability that Donald Trump is a “Putin compromised asset” can be reasonably estimated in the range of 60-70 on a scale of 1-100.

    This assessment reflects several key considerations:

    1. The substantial evidence of financial entanglements between Trump and Russian sources creates significant potential leverage.

    2. The consistent pattern of behavior favoring Putin and Russian interests, particularly Trump’s reluctance to criticize the Russian leader, suggests an unusual relationship.

    3. Intelligence community assessments that identified the Trump campaign’s Russian connections as counterintelligence threats carry substantial weight.

    4. The absence of definitive proof of compromise and the existence of plausible alternative explanations prevent a higher probability assessment.